Measurable Functions

In Axiomization of probability.

i.e. Random variables

Notations

Definition and Theorem of Approximation

Definition 1.(Ω,F)(\Omega,\mathcal{F})(E,E)(E,\mathcal{E})是测度空间,f:ΩEf:\Omega\to E是一个映射,如果对于每一个AEA\in\mathcal{E}f1(A)Ff^{-1}(A)\in\mathcal{F},则称ffF/E\mathcal{F}/\mathcal{E}-可测映射.

Definition 2.E=R,E=B(R)E=\overline{\mathbb{R}},\mathcal{E}=\mathcal{B}(\overline{\mathbb{R}}),则称ffBorel可测函数.

Example 3. Let F\mathscr{F} be some collection of fC(0,1)f\in C(0,1). Then Φ(x)=supfFf\Phi(x)=\sup_{f\in\mathscr{F}} f and Ψ(x)=inffFf\Psi(x)=\inf_{f\in\mathscr{F}} f is measurable.

Proof. Consider Et={x:Φ(x)>t}E_t={\{x:\Phi(x)>t\}}. Then Φ(x0)>t\Phi(x_0)>t implies that there exists fx0Ff_{x_0}\in\mathscr{F} such that fx0(x0)>tf_{x_0}(x_0)>t. Since ff is continuous, there exists δ>0\delta>0 s.t. for all xBδ(x0)x\in B_{\delta}(x_0), fx0(x)>tf_{x_0}(x)>t. Thus Bδ(x0)EtB_{\delta}(x_0)\subseteq E_t. Hence EtE_t is open, and Φ\Phi is measurable. \blacksquare

Example 4. Let {fk(x)}\{f_k(x)\} be a sequence of measurable functions over Rn\mathbb{R}^n. Then {x:limk+fk(x) exists}\{x:\lim_{k\to+\infty}f_k(x) \text{ exists}\} is measurable.

Proof. Let E={x:limk+fk(x) exists}E=\{x:\lim_{k\to+\infty}f_k(x) \text{ exists}\}. Then

E=m=1k=1n=kl=k{x:fn(x)fl(x)<1m}E=\bigcap_{m=1}^{\infty}\bigcup_{k=1}^{\infty}\bigcap_{n=k}^{\infty}\bigcap_{l=k}^{\infty}\{x:|f_n(x)-f_l(x)|<\frac{1}{m}\}

, which is measurable. \blacksquare

Example 5. Let F\mathscr{F} be some collection of measurable functions. Then Φ(x)=supfFf\Phi(x)=\sup_{f\in\mathscr{F}} f and Ψ(x)=inffFf\Psi(x)=\inf_{f\in\mathscr{F}} f may not be measurable.

Let F={χ{y}:yN}\mathscr{F}=\{\chi_{\{y\}}:y\in N\}, where NN is a Vitali Set. Then Φ(x)=χN\Phi(x)=\chi_N which is not measurable.

Definition 6. ff is a simple function if ff is measurable and takes only finitely many values. (non-continuous r.v.)

For a simple function ff, f=i=1naiχAif=\sum_{i=1}^n a_i\chi_{A_i}, where AiA_i are disjoint sets. We can prove the representation is unique.

And if all EiE_i are measurable, then ff is measurable.

Theorem 7. Let ff be a non-negative measurable function. Then there exists an increasing sequence of simple functions {fn}\{f_n\} s.t. fnff_n\to f pointwise.

Proof. Let

fn(x)=k=0n2n1k2nχ{k2nx<k2n+1}+nχ{fn}f_n(x)=\sum_{k=0}^{n2^n-1}\frac{k}{2^{n}}\chi_{\{\frac{k}{2^{n}}\leq x < \frac{k}{2^{n+1}}\}}+n\chi_{\{f\geq n\}}

. Then fnff_n\to f pointwise.

Theorem 8. Let ff be a measurable function. Then there exists a sequence of simple functions {fn}\{f_n\} s.t. fn(x)<f(x)|f_n(x)|<|f(x)| and fnff_n\to f pointwise.

In particular, if ff is bounded, then fnff_n\to f uniformly.

Convergence of Measurable Functions

Definition 9. Let fn,ff_n,f be measurable functions from (Ω,F,μ)(\Omega,\mathcal{F},\mu) to (R,B(R),m)(\mathbb{R},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}),m). Define

The convergence mentioned above of measurable functions is equivalent to the extent of a.e.\text{a.e.} equality. For example, if fnμff_n\stackrel{\mu}{\rightarrow}f and fnμgf_n\stackrel{\mu}{\rightarrow}g,

[fg>ϵ][ffk>ϵ2][gfk>ϵ2][|f-g|>\epsilon]\subset\big[|f-f_k|>\frac{\epsilon}{2}\big]\cup\big[|g-f_k|>\frac{\epsilon}{2}\big]

take kk\to\infty gives μ([fg>ϵ])=0\mu\big([|f-g|>\epsilon]\big)=0, which implies f=gf=g a.e.

Theorem 10. Let {fn}\{f_n\} and ff be measurable functions. Then fna.e.ff_n\stackrel{a.e.}{\rightarrow}f if and only if for all ϵ>0\epsilon>0,

μ(n=1+i=n+[fifϵ])=0\mu\big(\bigcap_{n=1}^{+\infty}\bigcup_{i=n}^{+\infty}[|f_i-f|\geq\epsilon]\big)= 0

Proof. x{fnf}x\in \{f_n\to f\} if and only if for all k>0k>0, there exists NN s.t. for all n>Nn>N, fn(x)f(x)<1k|f_n(x)-f(x)|<\frac{1}{k}     \iff

xk=1+n=1+i=n+[fif<1k].x\in\bigcap_{k=1}^{+\infty}\bigcup_{n=1}^{+\infty}\bigcap_{i=n}^{+\infty}[|f_i-f|<\frac{1}{k}].

So x{fnf}x\notin\{f_n\to f\} if and only if

xk=1+n=1+i=n+[fif1k]x\in\bigcup_{k=1}^{+\infty}\bigcap_{n=1}^{+\infty}\bigcup_{i=n}^{+\infty}[|f_i-f|\geq\frac{1}{k}]

and

μ(k=1+n=1+i=n+[fif1k])=0    k>0  μ(n=1+i=n+[fif1k])=0\mu\big(\bigcup_{k=1}^{+\infty}\bigcap_{n=1}^{+\infty}\bigcup_{i=n}^{+\infty}[|f_i-f|\geq\frac{1}{k}]\big)=0\iff\forall k>0\;\mu\big(\bigcap_{n=1}^{+\infty}\bigcup_{i=n}^{+\infty}[|f_i-f|\geq\frac{1}{k}]\big)=0

Theorem 11. Let {fn}\{f_n\} and ff be measurable functions. Then fna.un.ff_n\stackrel{a.un.}{\rightarrow}f if and only if for all ϵ>0\epsilon>0,

limn+μ(i=n+[fifϵ])=0\lim_{n\to+\infty}\mu\big(\bigcup_{i=n}^{+\infty}[|f_i-f|\geq\epsilon]\big)=0

Proof. fna.un.ff_n\stackrel{a.un.}{\rightarrow}f implies that for all δ>0\delta>0 there exists a set FF that μ(F)<δ\mu(F)<\delta s.t. ϵ>0\forall\epsilon>0, N>0\exists N>0 s.t. xFc\forall x\in F^c, n>N\forall n>N, fn(x)f(x)<ϵ|f_n(x)-f(x)|<\epsilon, i.e.

δ>0  F  μ(F)<δ   s.t. ϵ>0  n>0  i=n+[fifϵ]F\forall\delta>0\;\exists F\;\mu(F)<\delta\; \text{ s.t. } \forall\epsilon>0\;\exists n>0\;\bigcup_{i=n}^{+\infty}[|f_i-f|\geq\epsilon]\subset F

that is,

δ>0  ϵ>0  n>0  μ(i=n+[fifϵ])δ\forall\delta>0\;\forall\epsilon>0\;\exists n>0\;\mu\big(\bigcup_{i=n}^{+\infty}[|f_i-f|\geq\epsilon]\big)\leq\delta

Applying sup limit to nn gives

ϵ>0  δ>0  limn+μ(i=n+[fifϵ])δ\forall\epsilon>0\;\forall\delta>0\;\overline{\lim_{n\to+\infty}}\mu\big(\bigcup_{i=n}^{+\infty}[|f_i-f|\geq\epsilon]\big)\leq\delta

and the result follows.

For the other side, for all k>0k>0 and δ>0\delta>0, there exists nkn_k s.t.

μ(i=nk+[fif1k])<δ2k.\mu\big(\bigcup_{i=n_k}^{+\infty}[|f_i-f|\geq\frac{1}{k}]\big)<\frac{\delta}{2^k}.

Let

F=k=1+i=nk+[fif1k]F=\bigcup_{k=1}^{+\infty}\bigcup_{i=n_k}^{+\infty}[|f_i-f|\geq\frac{1}{k}]

and μ(F)<δ\mu(F)<\delta. Then

Fc=k=1+i=nk+[fif<1k]F^c=\bigcap_{k=1}^{+\infty}\bigcap_{i=n_k}^{+\infty}[|f_i-f|<\frac{1}{k}]

Note that nkn_k is only a function of kk. So the convergence is uniform over FcF^c, and fna.un.ff_n\stackrel{a.un.}{\rightarrow}f.

Theorem 12. Let {fn}\{f_n\} and ff be measurable functions. Then fnμff_n\stackrel{\mu}{\rightarrow}f if and only if for all subsequence {fnk}\{f_{n_k}\}, there exists a further subsequence {fnkl}\{f_{n_{k_l}}\} s.t. fnkla.un.ff_{n_{k_l}}\stackrel{a.un.}{\rightarrow}f.

Corollary 13. (1) a.un.a.e.\text{a.un.}\Rightarrow\text{a.e.}; a.un.μ\text{a.un.}\Rightarrow\mu

(2) (Егоров) If μ(Ω)<\mu(\Omega)<\infty, then a.e.a.un.\text{a.e.}\Rightarrow\text{a.un.}

(3) (Riesz) If fnμff_n\stackrel{\mu}{\rightarrow}f, then there exists a subsequence {fnk}\{f_{n_k}\} s.t. fnka.e.ff_{n_k}\stackrel{a.e.}{\rightarrow}f.

Proof. (2) Finite measure is upward continuous.

Note. Be cautious of the difference of a.e. finite and a.e. bounded!

An essential part: convergence in distribution

Lemma.(not verified) fn,f:ΩRf_n,f:\Omega\mapsto\mathbb{R} are measurable functions (i.e. random variables). Then

fndfa,bΛf,R1[a,b)fnR1[a,b)ff_n\stackrel{\text{d}}{\rightarrow}f\Leftrightarrow\forall a,b\in\Lambda_f,\int_{\mathbb{R}}\mathbf{1}_{[a,b)}\circ f_n\to\int_{\mathbb{R}}\mathbf{1}_{[a,b)}\circ f

Attempt. Let Fn,FF_n,F be the distribution functions of fn,ff_n,f. Then

FnF on Λfa,bΛf,Fn(b)Fn(a)F(b)F(a)F_n{\rightarrow}F \text{ on }\Lambda_f\Leftrightarrow\forall a,b\in\Lambda_f,F_n(b)-F_n(a)\to F(b)-F(a)

\Rightarrow is trivial.

\Leftarrow: Pick {an},b\{a_n\},b from Λf\Lambda_f arbitrarily s.t. ana_n\to-\infty as n+n\to+\infty.

Then Fn(b)F(b)Fn(ak)F(ak)+Fn(b)Fn(ak)+F(ak)F(b)|F_n(b)-F(b)|\leq|F_n(a_k)-F(a_k)|+|F_n(b)-F_n(a_k)+F(a_k)-F(b)|.

For every ϵ>0\epsilon>0, we pick n=Nn=N large enough s.t. Fn(b)Fn(ak)+F(ak)F(b)<ϵ3|F_n(b)-F_n(a_k)+F(a_k)-F(b)|<\frac{\epsilon}{3}, for such NN, using the property of a distribution function, there exists k=Kk=K large enough s.t. FN(aK)<ϵ3|F_N(a_K)|<\frac{\epsilon}{3} and F(aK)<ϵ3|F(a_K)|<\frac{\epsilon}{3}.

To conclude, FN(b)F(b)<ϵ|F_N(b)-F(b)|<\epsilon, and can be arbitrarily small.

The proof is deemed fake because the process of n+n\to+\infty and k+k\to+\infty can not exchange.