Measurable Functions
In Axiomization of probability.
i.e. Random variables
Notations
- Lb+(C): the set of all bounded measurable functions on C.
Definition and Theorem of Approximation
Definition 1. 设(Ω,F)和(E,E)是测度空间,f:Ω→E是一个映射,如果对于每一个A∈E,f−1(A)∈F,则称f是F/E-可测映射.
Definition 2. 令E=R,E=B(R),则称f为Borel可测函数.
Example 3. Let F be some collection of f∈C(0,1). Then Φ(x)=supf∈Ff and Ψ(x)=inff∈Ff is measurable.
Proof. Consider Et={x:Φ(x)>t}. Then Φ(x0)>t implies that there exists fx0∈F such that fx0(x0)>t. Since f is continuous, there exists δ>0 s.t. for all x∈Bδ(x0), fx0(x)>t. Thus Bδ(x0)⊆Et. Hence Et is open, and Φ is measurable.
■
Example 4. Let {fk(x)} be a sequence of measurable functions over Rn. Then {x:limk→+∞fk(x) exists} is measurable.
Proof. Let E={x:limk→+∞fk(x) exists}. Then
E=m=1⋂∞k=1⋃∞n=k⋂∞l=k⋂∞{x:∣fn(x)−fl(x)∣<m1}
, which is measurable.
■
Example 5. Let F be some collection of measurable functions. Then Φ(x)=supf∈Ff and Ψ(x)=inff∈Ff may not be measurable.
Let F={χ{y}:y∈N}, where N is a Vitali Set. Then Φ(x)=χN which is not measurable.
Definition 6. f is a simple function if f is measurable and takes only finitely many values. (non-continuous r.v.)
For a simple function f, f=∑i=1naiχAi, where Ai are disjoint sets. We can prove the representation is unique.
And if all Ei are measurable, then f is measurable.
Theorem 7. Let f be a non-negative measurable function. Then there exists an increasing sequence of simple functions {fn} s.t. fn→f pointwise.
Proof. Let
fn(x)=k=0∑n2n−12nkχ{2nk≤x<2n+1k}+nχ{f≥n}
. Then fn→f pointwise.
Theorem 8. Let f be a measurable function. Then there exists a sequence of simple functions {fn} s.t. ∣fn(x)∣<∣f(x)∣ and fn→f pointwise.
In particular, if f is bounded, then fn→f uniformly.
Convergence of Measurable Functions
Definition 9. Let fn,f be measurable functions from (Ω,F,μ) to (R,B(R),m). Define
- fn→f a.e. if there exists a zero-measure set N s.t. fn(ω)→f(ω) over Nc.
- fn→f a.un. if there exists a zero-measure set N s.t. fn(ω)⇉f(ω) over Nc.
- fn→f in measure if limn→∞μ({∣fn(ω)−f(ω)∣>ϵ})=0 for all ϵ>0.
The convergence mentioned above of measurable functions is equivalent to the extent of a.e. equality. For example, if fn→μf and fn→μg,
[∣f−g∣>ϵ]⊂[∣f−fk∣>2ϵ]∪[∣g−fk∣>2ϵ]
take k→∞ gives μ([∣f−g∣>ϵ])=0, which implies f=g a.e.
Theorem 10. Let {fn} and f be measurable functions. Then
fn→a.e.f if and only if for all ϵ>0,
μ(n=1⋂+∞i=n⋃+∞[∣fi−f∣≥ϵ])=0
Proof. x∈{fn→f} if and only if for all k>0, there exists N s.t. for all n>N, ∣fn(x)−f(x)∣<k1 ⟺
x∈k=1⋂+∞n=1⋃+∞i=n⋂+∞[∣fi−f∣<k1].
So x∈/{fn→f} if and only if x∈k=1⋃+∞n=1⋂+∞i=n⋃+∞[∣fi−f∣≥k1]
and
μ(k=1⋃+∞n=1⋂+∞i=n⋃+∞[∣fi−f∣≥k1])=0⟺∀k>0μ(n=1⋂+∞i=n⋃+∞[∣fi−f∣≥k1])=0
Theorem 11. Let {fn} and f be measurable functions. Then
fn→a.un.f if and only if for all ϵ>0,
n→+∞limμ(i=n⋃+∞[∣fi−f∣≥ϵ])=0
Proof. fn→a.un.f implies that for all δ>0 there exists a set F
that μ(F)<δ s.t. ∀ϵ>0, ∃N>0 s.t. ∀x∈Fc, ∀n>N, ∣fn(x)−f(x)∣<ϵ, i.e.
∀δ>0∃Fμ(F)<δ s.t. ∀ϵ>0∃n>0i=n⋃+∞[∣fi−f∣≥ϵ]⊂F
that is,
∀δ>0∀ϵ>0∃n>0μ(i=n⋃+∞[∣fi−f∣≥ϵ])≤δ
Applying sup limit to n gives
∀ϵ>0∀δ>0n→+∞limμ(i=n⋃+∞[∣fi−f∣≥ϵ])≤δ
and the result follows.
For the other side, for all k>0 and δ>0, there exists nk s.t.
μ(i=nk⋃+∞[∣fi−f∣≥k1])<2kδ.
Let
F=k=1⋃+∞i=nk⋃+∞[∣fi−f∣≥k1]
and μ(F)<δ. Then
Fc=k=1⋂+∞i=nk⋂+∞[∣fi−f∣<k1]
Note that nk is only a function of k. So
the convergence is uniform over Fc, and
fn→a.un.f.
Theorem 12. Let {fn} and f be measurable functions. Then
fn→μf if and only if for all
subsequence {fnk}, there exists a further subsequence {fnkl} s.t. fnkl→a.un.f.
Corollary 13.
(1) a.un.⇒a.e.; a.un.⇒μ
(2) (Егоров) If μ(Ω)<∞, then a.e.⇒a.un.
(3) (Riesz) If fn→μf, then there exists a subsequence {fnk} s.t. fnk→a.e.f.
Proof. (2) Finite measure is upward continuous.
Note. Be cautious of the difference of a.e. finite and a.e. bounded!
An essential part: convergence in distribution
Lemma.(not verified) fn,f:Ω↦R are measurable functions (i.e. random variables). Then
fn→df⇔∀a,b∈Λf,∫R1[a,b)∘fn→∫R1[a,b)∘f
Attempt. Let Fn,F be the distribution functions of fn,f. Then
Fn→F on Λf⇔∀a,b∈Λf,Fn(b)−Fn(a)→F(b)−F(a)
⇒ is trivial.
⇐: Pick {an},b from Λf arbitrarily s.t. an→−∞ as n→+∞.
Then ∣Fn(b)−F(b)∣≤∣Fn(ak)−F(ak)∣+∣Fn(b)−Fn(ak)+F(ak)−F(b)∣.
For every ϵ>0, we pick n=N large enough s.t. ∣Fn(b)−Fn(ak)+F(ak)−F(b)∣<3ϵ,
for such N, using the property of a distribution function,
there exists k=K large enough s.t. ∣FN(aK)∣<3ϵ and ∣F(aK)∣<3ϵ.
To conclude, ∣FN(b)−F(b)∣<ϵ, and can be arbitrarily small.
The proof is deemed fake because the process of n→+∞ and
k→+∞ can not exchange.